June 2019

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, June 10th, 2004 09:13 pm
My boss said I could work from home on Friday.

This is key, because, thanks to the Reagan funeral, traffic is going to be hideous for me. My customer gets vacation. My boss is on leave. The other guy I work with is on leave.

But, it's the end of pay-period, and boss-of-boss claims I must either come into the office, or take leave. No telecommuting for me.

This blows. This blows much. I am not a happy puppy.
Thursday, June 10th, 2004 19:18 (UTC)
Use your icon's 40mm guns and get some payback. B)
Friday, June 11th, 2004 06:22 (UTC)
When I get my DD(X), you will all tremble before me!
Friday, June 11th, 2004 06:27 (UTC)
And as a side note, those are 155mm guns.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 06:36 (UTC)
I couldn't tell what sort of boat that was, so I erred on the side of PT. 155s would make that what? A destroyer?
Friday, June 11th, 2004 06:47 (UTC)
Yeah. It's the DD(X) - the "21st Century Destroyer" concept. It's supposed to go into production around 2006/7.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 06:58 (UTC)
Cool.

I thought everything in today's Navy was either SOG stuff, connected to the Carrier Battle Group or missiles. It's nice to know that big guns are still part of the design.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 07:24 (UTC)
I looked that up and found http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/dd-21.htm , which looks for all the world like a Skunkworks Stealth Submarine.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 07:41 (UTC)
The design is supposed to minimize radar signature, so that's not surprising.

The info there's fairly dated (they still call it DD-21) but it can give you a picture of where the Navy is headed - when the capital ships are more and more geared toward littoral/land-attack warfare.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 08:09 (UTC)
That makes sense. The last great ship-to-ship battles were in WWII, and really, the Battles of Pearl Harbor and Midway signalled the end of the battleship and the rise of the Carrier Battle Group. The return of the guns makes me question who they intend to fight with this. Even the big battleship guns can't extend firepower far beyond the horizon, and those are much smaller.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 08:35 (UTC)
It's not just that. We don't have the need for a huge bluewater navy, because there really aren't that many navies for us to oppose. Under the current navy leadership, the future is in mobile Sea Basing, and land attack support. (And missile defense)

The next generation of naval guns (and this is before we get into EMP weapons) are supposed to have precision over some extremely long distances.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 09:11 (UTC)
I get precision. I know that part. I'm curious how you can get longer distance without longer barrels.

And I haven't been keeping track of the Navy, being an AF brat, but the bluewater comment makes all the sense to me.

And I think we've now officially bored everyone else to tears.
Thursday, June 10th, 2004 20:46 (UTC)
You sound like Evil Little Dog Jebbie didn't give state workers off for the funeral. Me, I got laid off on monday because Jebbie also keeps cutting the budget and they actually ran out of money for TWO positions, both 20-30 hours a week but there was only one of us working (me) cut to 10 hours. I'm still puzzling out where 60 + hours of pay disappeared. Oh Mr Bush...
Thursday, June 10th, 2004 20:51 (UTC)
This is different. W gives federal employees off. However, I work for a private contracting firm, and we don't get holiday. Seeing as I'm saving my leave for the 4th of July time, I've got to work.
Thursday, June 10th, 2004 22:06 (UTC)
Yeah that'll suck. When I worked for the feds I got off for Nixon's funeral which to me was just ironic since I worked in a VA hospital where you know they really shouldn't be giving leave time to the doctors for any reason.
Thursday, June 10th, 2004 22:52 (UTC)
I am not a happy puppy

Heh. Are you just a sad puppy with bad teeth, then?

Sorry, that sucks. Good luck with the traffic tomorrow!
Friday, June 11th, 2004 04:08 (UTC)
Dude, WTF? Is this another one of those "rules for rules' sake" bs things?
Friday, June 11th, 2004 08:24 (UTC)
Well, I was sulking that my some of my friends in the Gub'ment and on Wall Street get the day off and I don't.

But I have to agree your situation does suck more... At least I don't have to use vacation time or try to go to work in DC today. Sorry, dude. I do feel for you.
Friday, June 11th, 2004 17:29 (UTC)
Sorry about the whole traffic, boss-of-boss thing.