June 2019

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, September 14th, 2005 09:03 pm
Was gonna be ten. Actually just five.

1. The Redskins front office is completely dysfunctional. In the offseason, Coach/Team President Joe Gibbs declared Patrick Ramsey the starter, yet benched him after three series in favor of Mark Brunell. Ramsey didn't look particularly good, but this doesn't reflect well on the coach. If you had so little confidence in Ramsey that you'd bench him so quickly, then why offer him the starting job at all? Neither of these quarterbacks are any good. But things being equal, if Gibbs was going to give Ramsey a shot - he should have given him the shot he gave Brunell. The Brunell who pretty much destroyed Washington's season last year with his ineffectiveness.

2. Michigan is way overrated. Again.

3. I will need to see the Colts play against a legit NFL Offense before I decide whether or not their defense is for real. Ditto the Redskins. Ditto the Bears.

4. I have seen the future of the NFL Tight End position, and it's name is Vernon Davis (TE - Maryland). Davis, a junior, will be taken in the first round of the draft. Within five years, he will make the Pro Bowl. Maryland will only win five games this year, and his stats will probably not look earth shattering, but this is the future.

5. Michael Vick is the single most exciting football player I have ever seen. He's not nearly as accurate as he needs to be. But he wins games already, and he will improve. He's not the passer John Elway was, and maybe he never will be. But he does recall the old adage. Your best player should be playing QB, because you want that guy to touch the ball on every play. It's a rare quarterback that's so gifted a runner that NFL Coaches have to bring back QB Power Sweeps that haven't been run since the 1930s. He is not the runner that Barry Sanders is. But Barry Sanders didn't throw rope spirals fifty yards downfield.

Even if Vick never develops as the player he might yet be, watching him play is a joy.
Thursday, September 15th, 2005 14:32 (UTC)
I thought he was going to be an all-time QB those first few years.

I think most people did. I didn't know about that specific injury, but he's certainly in decline. He looks better than last year, when he threw like a 90-year-old, but he's still looking like toast. Just have to hope, man...

Vick is going to be watching the SuperBowl from home until he's able to sit in the pocket and complete the quick read throw on a blitz.

Absolutely. At this point, Barry Sanders is probably the better comparison then Elway. Vick can give huge and dynamite plays, but he doesn't have the consistency to lead repeated, sustained drives - and Super Bowl Teams require that. Fortunately, he has running backs and a decent O-Line, so at least he won't get killed while he tries to figure that out.

It's hard to say if there's a "Jordan Effect" in football. The big difference is that you've got 11 players on the field and ten guys can pick up slack for one guy in a way they can't in other sports. The Bulls couldn't make the finals without MJ. But last year, the Eagles won two playoff games playing without TO and with some truly awful receivers.

Players who are tone setters and exercise leadership can make huge impacts - but it's much harder for one player to do it solely through sheer physical talent. Maybe the best example was Elway taking those otherwise pedestrian Broncos teams to three Super Bowls in the 80s.