June 2017

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

January 6th, 2010

dlgood: (Beat Army)
Wednesday, January 6th, 2010 01:14 am
  • Thanks for all the birthday wishes. A happy new years and holiday season to all. I've never had any problem with my Birthday so close to the holidays - save for the sad fact that the latter half of December is one of the most relaxing times of the year for me as work gets very slack - and that my Birthday always coincides with getting slammed again with responsibility.

  • David Letterman's Top Ten List for Washington Wizards' Explanations for Gilbert Arenas' bringing guns into the locker room was about as Funny as Dave's been in a long time.

  • It's a shame Georgia Tech's option offense doesn't seem to work against any good defense that has time to prepare. And yet Missouri couldn't stop Navy?

  • Redskins hire Mike Shanahan. But Dan Snyder is still the owner. It won't work.

  • Saw three movies this winter: Avatar, Sherlock Holmes, and Up in the Air. Sherlock Holmes was only okay. Story was weak. But the characters were likeable and fun, and it never bored me. That's all I really need.

  • Avatar is visually fantastic, but the characterization of the antagonists are awful. I don't mind Cameron making strip-mining, soulless, materialist and militaristic corporations the villains. But did they have to be so stupid about it? If I can't respect the intelligence of the antagonists, I'm not going to get myself wrapped up by any 'message' promoted, whether it's the 'dances with wolves in space' or 'evil corporations' angle. It's a nice action/adventure/romance in space with fantastic and immersive presentation - and beyond that merits little thought but much enjoyment.

  • Up in the Air, OTOH, was truly excellent. Clooney's suited for the role, but I was really impressed by Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick, who had good characters and did great work with them. Unlike Avatar and Sherlock Holmes, this movie did not go where I expected it to but did not leave me confused by how it got where it did. Big thumbs up.

  • My three favorite movies of 2009, in order: "The Hurt Locker", "Up in the Air", and "Inglorious Basterds". All three are excellent in their own way, especially Hurt Locker. It is the best possible movie that could be made of that movie, if you follow. Not necessarily my favorite or the most fun, but possibly the best executed movie of the last five years. Kathryn Bigelow and Jeremy Renner derserve oscars.


Watch this space. I may yet have more thoughts and actual post this week. I haven't even gotten to TV.
dlgood: (Beat Army)
Wednesday, January 6th, 2010 01:14 am
  • Thanks for all the birthday wishes. A happy new years and holiday season to all. I've never had any problem with my Birthday so close to the holidays - save for the sad fact that the latter half of December is one of the most relaxing times of the year for me as work gets very slack - and that my Birthday always coincides with getting slammed again with responsibility.

  • David Letterman's Top Ten List for Washington Wizards' Explanations for Gilbert Arenas' bringing guns into the locker room was about as Funny as Dave's been in a long time.

  • It's a shame Georgia Tech's option offense doesn't seem to work against any good defense that has time to prepare. And yet Missouri couldn't stop Navy?

  • Redskins hire Mike Shanahan. But Dan Snyder is still the owner. It won't work.

  • Saw three movies this winter: Avatar, Sherlock Holmes, and Up in the Air. Sherlock Holmes was only okay. Story was weak. But the characters were likeable and fun, and it never bored me. That's all I really need.

  • Avatar is visually fantastic, but the characterization of the antagonists are awful. I don't mind Cameron making strip-mining, soulless, materialist and militaristic corporations the villains. But did they have to be so stupid about it? If I can't respect the intelligence of the antagonists, I'm not going to get myself wrapped up by any 'message' promoted, whether it's the 'dances with wolves in space' or 'evil corporations' angle. It's a nice action/adventure/romance in space with fantastic and immersive presentation - and beyond that merits little thought but much enjoyment.

  • Up in the Air, OTOH, was truly excellent. Clooney's suited for the role, but I was really impressed by Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick, who had good characters and did great work with them. Unlike Avatar and Sherlock Holmes, this movie did not go where I expected it to but did not leave me confused by how it got where it did. Big thumbs up.

  • My three favorite movies of 2009, in order: "The Hurt Locker", "Up in the Air", and "Inglorious Basterds". All three are excellent in their own way, especially Hurt Locker. It is the best possible movie that could be made of that movie, if you follow. Not necessarily my favorite or the most fun, but possibly the best executed movie of the last five years. Kathryn Bigelow and Jeremy Renner derserve oscars.


Watch this space. I may yet have more thoughts and actual post this week. I haven't even gotten to TV.
dlgood: (Default)
Wednesday, January 6th, 2010 07:26 pm
Today, MLB announced this year's Hall of Fame class:

1. Andre Dawson

Much like last year (Jim Rice) Dawson was a very good player with a great career, but a player who wouldn't have made my list. Both were sluggers who put up nice first order stats, didn't get on base nearly enough, were overrated because of Home Run totals and favorable park effects - and who were actually less valuable then their less splashy but more well rounded outfield teammates. (Dwight Evans and Tim Raines)

Well, what's done is done. It does show that the revolution in baseball analysis still hasn't quite made it through to the old men who vote on the hall. That said, here's my ballot:

1. Roberto Alomar
2. Bert Blyleven
3. Barry Larkin
4. Edgar Martinez
5. Tim Raines
6. Alan Trammel

Blyleven and Alomar are probably locks to get in next year. Jack Morris and Mark McGwire might have a shot next year. Raines and Trammel continue to be criminally underrated. Of course, if any of these gents really want in, they'd better get cracking for 2011 and 2012 balloting. Because starting with 2013, the really big stars come up (Biggio, Clemens, Piazza) and they all go to the back of the line...
Tags:
dlgood: (Default)
Wednesday, January 6th, 2010 07:26 pm
Today, MLB announced this year's Hall of Fame class:

1. Andre Dawson

Much like last year (Jim Rice) Dawson was a very good player with a great career, but a player who wouldn't have made my list. Both were sluggers who put up nice first order stats, didn't get on base nearly enough, were overrated because of Home Run totals and favorable park effects - and who were actually less valuable then their less splashy but more well rounded outfield teammates. (Dwight Evans and Tim Raines)

Well, what's done is done. It does show that the revolution in baseball analysis still hasn't quite made it through to the old men who vote on the hall. That said, here's my ballot:

1. Roberto Alomar
2. Bert Blyleven
3. Barry Larkin
4. Edgar Martinez
5. Tim Raines
6. Alan Trammel

Blyleven and Alomar are probably locks to get in next year. Jack Morris and Mark McGwire might have a shot next year. Raines and Trammel continue to be criminally underrated. Of course, if any of these gents really want in, they'd better get cracking for 2011 and 2012 balloting. Because starting with 2013, the really big stars come up (Biggio, Clemens, Piazza) and they all go to the back of the line...
Tags: